Charlotte H, Author at Exquisite Timepieces - Page 4 of 16

Author: Charlotte H

cartier tank must small vs large

Cartier Tank Must Showdown: Small vs. Large

Charlotte H

April 28, 2025

Size matters, especially when you’re strapping on a watch as legendary as the Cartier Tank Must. And let’s be real, choosing between the Small and Large isn’t exactly easy.

On one hand, you want your watch to make an impression, so it fares to go big, right? But then you remember this is a dress watch, so the size should feel effortless, and comfortable, sitting just right without dominating your frame.

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

As someone who obsesses over watch sizes, and as a person with a relatively small wrist but a love for larger watches, I know how important it is to find the right balance. Too big, and it overwhelms your wrist but too small, and it might not give you the presence you want.

The Cartier Tank Must is all about proportions, elegance, and wearability, so choosing between the Small and Large comes down to more than just aesthetics. It’s about how it feels, how it fits, and how it complements your style. In this guide, I’ll break it all down to help you find your perfect match.

A Quick History of the Cartier Tank Must

Cartier Tank Must History

The Cartier Tank is one of the most iconic watches of all time, a design that has barely changed since its creation in 1917. Inspired by the silhouette of military tanks viewed from above, its clean lines and rectangular shape broke away from the round pocket watches of the era. The Tank was revolutionary, not just in design but also in its philosophy.

It was a watch for everyone, worn by style icons, Hollywood stars, and royalty alike. Over the decades, Cartier introduced multiple variations, but in the 1970s, a new era of the Tank was born with the Must de Cartier, otherwise known as the Tank Must.

The 1970s were a turning point for the watch industry. With the rise of quartz movements, traditional mechanical watches were facing an identity crisis.

Cartier, known for its ultra-luxurious timepieces, saw an opportunity to create something more accessible while maintaining the brand’s signature elegance. Enter the Must de Cartier collection in 1977. Unlike its solid gold predecessors, the Tank Must featured gold-plated cases and quartz movements, making it a more affordable luxury.

Minimalist yet striking, the Cartier Tank Must was a departure from the ornate detailing of other Cartier timepieces. Many of the models had no numerals and indices, just a sleek dial and the classic sword-shaped hands.

The crown, still adorned with a blue cabochon, added a touch of unexpected flair. This balance of simplicity and boldness made the Tank Must an instant hit. It was a watch that felt luxurious but wasn’t out of reach which is a rare feat in high-end watchmaking.

Fast forward to 2021 and Cartier revived the Tank Must bringing back its signature minimalist aesthetic. The colorful lacquered dials returned as did many of the no-numeral dials. To this day, the collection stays true to the original Must ethos, remaining elegant, unisex, and effortlessly wearable.

The Cartier Tank Must Small

The Cartier Tank Must actually comes in three sizes: Small, Large, and Extra Large. The Extra Large is the only model equipped with an automatic movement, so today, we’re focusing on the two quartz-powered sizes, the Small and Large models, to help you decide which one suits you best.

The Cartier Tank Must Small measures 29.5mm by 22mm with a slim height of 6.6mm, making it the most compact and refined of the lineup.

Each model maintains the Tank’s signature aesthetic with its slim, polished rectangular case topped with sapphire crystal glass. And of course, they all feature the brand’s hallmark blue spinel cabochon set into the crown.

As of writing this article, the modern Tank Must Small offers four different variations, all sharing the same crisp white dial with black Roman numerals, blued sword-shaped hands, and an internal railway minutes track.

The most accessible model in the collection is the classic Small Tank Must on a black leather strap, powered by a traditional Swiss quartz movement. It’s elegant, understated, and a perfect introduction to the world of Cartier.

For those looking for something a little more innovative, there’s the Small Tank Must SolarBeat™. Debuting with the modern Tank Must collection, the SolarBeat™ movement is a groundbreaking photovoltaic-powered quartz caliber that uses light to recharge, offering an impressive 16-year battery life.

This means fewer battery changes and a more sustainable way to wear a luxury timepiece. Externally, this model looks identical to its traditional quartz counterpart but offers a more eco-conscious and forward-thinking movement inside.

For a touch of extra glamour, Cartier also offers the Small Tank Must with diamonds. This version retains the same SolarBeat™ movement but adds brilliant-cut diamonds along the case flanks, giving it a refined sparkle that elevates its presence on the wrist. It’s still classic but with an extra dose of elegance.

Finally, the last model in the Small Tank Must collection swaps the traditional leather strap for a sleek stainless steel bracelet.

Also powered by the SolarBeat™ movement, this version blends the timeless Cartier aesthetic with a more contemporary and versatile metal bracelet, making it perfect for those who prefer a polished, everyday-wear look.

The Cartier Tank Large

If you’re considering the Cartier Tank Must Large, you have even more choices than with the Small model. Not only are there multiple dial colors, but also different dial layouts including those without any numerals or indices, a design I personally love. If you appreciate minimalism, this could be a big deciding factor for you.

First things first, all models labeled as “Large” share the same dimensions measuring to 33.7mm by 25.5mm, with a slim 6.6mm height. They’re all crafted from stainless steel, featuring the signature rectangular case, polished sides, and sapphire crystal glass.

Much like the Small variations, some of these Large models stick to the classic Cartier aesthetic, featuring the crisp white dial with black Roman numerals, blued steel hands, and an internal railway minute track.

One of these comes on a black leather strap, while another offers the same strap but with a touch of extra luxury, diamonds set along the flanks of the case. Two other options swap out the leather for a sleek stainless steel H-link bracelet.

For those looking for something a little more modern and sustainable, there are also versions that trade the traditional quartz movement for the photovoltaic SolarBeat™ movement. These models come in both leather strap and steel bracelet variations.

Then, we have the models that truly stand out. These are where Cartier embraces a more minimalist, yet boldly colorful approach. Unlike the traditional white dial versions, these pieces strip away the Roman numerals and railway track altogether, leaving just two sleek hands and the Cartier logo at 12 o’clock.

The effect is a strikingly clean design that feels both contemporary and timeless. These models feature lacquered dials in four stunning shades of burgundy red, emerald green, royal blue, and classic black.

Each dial is complemented by rhodium-finished steel sword-shaped hands and a semi-matte alligator leather strap in a matching color, secured with a steel ardillon buckle.

Interestingly, despite being larger in surface area than the Small model, these minimalist Large variations are actually the slimmest of all, with a height of just 6mm giving them an extra sleek, refined profile on the wrist.

Cartier Tank Must Small vs Large – How to Choose

So, now that we’ve gone over both models individually, how do they stack up against each other? If you’re stuck deciding between the Small and the Large, let’s break down the key differences to help you figure out which one’s the better fit for your wrist and your style.

Differences in Size and Proportions

Obviously, the most obvious difference is size. The Small measures 29.5mm by 22mm, while the Large comes in at 33.7mm by 25.5mm. That might not sound like a massive jump, but on the wrist, it’s noticeable. The Large also has a bit more presence, without tipping over into being oversized.

Another key factor is thickness. The classic white-dialled Small and Large versions are a little thicker at around 6.6mm, whereas the Large with the ultra-minimalist lacquered dials are even slimmer at just 6mm, giving them an extra sleek, refined look.

Differences in Design Options

While both sizes offer the classic Cartier silver-white dials with Roman numerals, blued hands, and polished steel cases, the Large model gives you a few more dial colours to choose from. If you love the traditional Cartier aesthetic, both sizes will work, but if you want something a little different, the Large has a few options that stand out.

Some feature no numerals at all, just clean dials with two hands and the Cartier logo, creating a minimalist, modern feel. This ultra-clean look, paired with lacquered dials in striking colors like burgundy, green, blue, and black, isn’t available in the Small size, making the Large the go-to if you want something bolder.

Differences in Movement

Both sizes come with traditional quartz movements and Cartier’s eco-friendly SolarBeat™ movement. So thankfully, there’s no difference here in terms of functionality.

You’ve got a choice of whether you want the classic quartz or the SolarBeat upgrade. That said, if you’ve got your heart set on an automatic movement, then you’ll have to explore the Cartier Tank Much Extra Large family for that.

Differences in Price

Naturally, the Large models are slightly more expensive, typically by a couple of hundred dollars. In the grand scheme of Cartier pricing, that’s not a huge jump, but if you’re on the fence between the two sizes, it might be a factor worth considering.

The Small keeps things a little more budget-friendly, while the Large asks for a bit more, but also gives you extra dial options and a bigger presence on the wrist in return.

Which One is Right for You?

If you have a smaller wrist, prefer something more discreet, or just love the idea of a classic, timeless Cartier dress watch, the Cartier Tank Must Small is a fantastic choice. It’s elegant, refined, and fits beautifully under a cuff.

That said, if you want a little more presence, appreciate a slightly larger dial, or love the idea of those sleek, numeral-free color options, the Large is the way to go.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, both the Cartier Tank Must Small and Large are stunning options. You can’t really ever go wrong with a Cartier because these watches, no matter their size, are timeless, effortlessly stylish, and built with the kind of design language that has made them icons for over a century.

But when it comes down to choosing between them, there are two big factors that should guide your decision: the size of your wrist (and the presence you want the watch to have) and which dial design speaks to you the most.

For example, I have relatively small wrists at around 5.5 inches, so logically, the Cartier Tank Must Small would be the best fit for my frame. But I can’t help but love those bright lacquered dials with no numerals or indices on the Large models.

Those are what really call to me. They feel more aligned with my style, and I know I’d reach for them ten times more than the classic white dial with Roman numerals. So for me, that’s what would make the decision.

And that’s exactly how you should go about it, too. Consider the sizing, think about the designs you love, and decide what matters most to you. If you want something classic, understated, and perfectly proportioned for a smaller wrist, the Cartier Tank Must Small is a fantastic choice.

If you want something a little bolder, with a bit more presence and unique dial options, the Large is where it’s at. Either way, you’ll end up with a Cartier Tank on your wrist and that’s never a bad thing.

rolex president bracelet vs jubilee

When we think about watches and which one to buy for ourselves, most of us focus on the dial, the case, or maybe the movement inside. But the bracelet is often an afterthought.

It really shouldn’t be though, because the strap can make a huge difference to the watch. It doesn’t just keep it secured to your wrist, but it plays a huge part in how the watch looks, feels and even wears over time.

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

And if there’s one brand that’s absolutely nailed the art of bracelet design, it’s Rolex. Over the decades, Rolex has introduced a handful of iconic bracelets, but two stand out above the rest: the President bracelet and the Jubilee bracelet.

If you’ve spent any time browsing Rolex watches, you’ve probably seen both. The President has a bold and luxurious three-link design while the Jubilee gives off more of a vintage vibe with its intricate, dressy five-link construction.

But what’s the real difference between them? Is one better than the other? And most importantly, which one is the best match for you and your style? That’s exactly what we’re about to break down in this head-to-head battle of Rolex’s two iconic bracelets.

The Rolex President Bracelet

The Rolex President Bracelet

If there’s one bracelet in the world of watches that screams power, prestige, and luxury, it’s the Rolex President.

Even if you’re not a hardcore watch enthusiast, chances are you’ve seen this bracelet before whether it’s wrapped around the wrist of a world leader, a celebrity, or perhaps in a glitzy Rolex display case.

There’s something undeniably regal about the President bracelet, and that’s no accident. Rolex designed it to make a statement, and over the decades, it’s become just as iconic as the watches it’s attached to.

The President bracelet made its debut in 1956, exclusively designed for the launch of the Rolex Day-Date, a watch that was itself groundbreaking since it was the first to display both the date and the full day of the week spelled out on the dial.

Rolex didn’t just want the Day-Date to be another luxury timepiece though, they wanted it to be a watch that symbolizes success and status. So they created a bracelet to match,  one that was bold, beautiful, and reserved only for the brand’s most prestigious models.

The Rolex President is a three-piece link design, but unlike the flat, wide links of the sporty Oyster bracelet it has semi-circular, almost little D-shaped links, that give the bracelet a rounded, almost fluid look as it catches the light.

It’s also noticeably more substantial and weighty on the wrist compared to the Oyster which only further adds to its luxurious feel. It’s one of those watch straps that feels like jewellery, but still with the durability and comfort you want in a high-end timepiece.

You’ll only ever find the President bracelet on Rolex watches made from precious metals. Rolex doesn’t do stainless steel when it comes to this bracelet. Instead, the President is exclusively crafted from 18k gold (yellow, white, or Everose) or platinum, ensuring that every time it’s worn, it feels like a statement of status.

You’ll most commonly see it on the Day-Date, which many people now casually refer to as the “Rolex President” because of the bracelet, but it also appears on certain versions of the Lady-Datejust in precious metals.

So why is the Rolex President bracelet called the President? The name first emerged in 1965 when U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson was regularly seen wearing a yellow gold Day-Date with the newly designed bracelet.

Rolex even ran an advertisement referring to it as “the President’s watch” and from that moment on, the name stuck. In fact, it wasn’t long before the bracelet itself became known as the “President bracelet,” even though Rolex had originally just called it the Day-Date bracelet.

There’s also a popular story about Dwight D. Eisenhower being gifted a gold Rolex with a similar bracelet, but that was actually an Oyster bracelet, not the President.

Still, by the time Johnson put it on his wrist and countless other world leaders, CEOs, and Hollywood icons followed suit, the association between the Day-Date, the President bracelet, and a symbol of power was locked in forever.

One of the most unique aspects of the President bracelet is its hidden Crownclasp. Unlike traditional watch clasps that are visible when closed, the Crownclasp blends seamlessly into the design.

Once fastened, you can only see the iconic Rolex crown logo, making it look like the bracelet has no visible opening at all. It’s subtle, refined, and just another example of the attention to detail that Rolex are well known for.

Over the years, Rolex has played around with some variations of the President bracelet. Some vintage models feature a “bark finish” on the center link, a textured effect that mimics the look of tree bark. Others have appeared adorned with diamonds or other embellishments.

But the core design has remained largely unchanged since 1956, which is a testament to how perfect the President bracelet really is.

The Rolex Jubilee Bracelet

The Rolex Jubilee Bracelet

If you know anything about Rolex, you’ll know the Jubilee bracelet is a bit of a legend in its own right. It’s one of those designs that’s instantly recognizable the moment you spot those small, intricate links shimmering on someone’s wrist.

And while the Jubilee bracelet was originally designed for dress watches, it’s found its way onto some of Rolex’s sportier models too, proving it can do both sophistication and casual cool rather effortlessly.

The Rolex Jubilee bracelet made its debut in 1945 and was specifically created to celebrate Rolex’s 40th anniversary, hence the name Jubilee.

Rolex needed a bracelet that would match the grandeur of their newest release, the Datejust, a groundbreaking watch that was the first to display an automatically changing date on the dial. Naturally, a watch this special needed a bracelet to match, so Rolex came up with something entirely new.

Unlike the bold three-link Oyster bracelet, the Jubilee featured a more intricate five-piece link design, combining brushed outer links with three smaller, polished center links. The result was a bracelet that looked dressy, felt incredibly comfortable, and oozed understated luxury.

Initially, the Jubilee bracelet was available only in solid gold, underscoring its status as a true luxury accessory. But as time went on, Rolex began introducing two-tone (Rolesor) and stainless steel versions, allowing more people to experience the Jubilee’s charm without the eye-watering price tag of solid gold.

That shift also paved the way for the Jubilee to appear on a wider variety of models than the Datejust. That again made it more versatile in both style and appeal.

One of the defining features of the Jubilee bracelet is how it drapes around your wrist. The five-link design with three smaller inner links and two larger outer links makes it incredibly flexible and comfortable to wear.

It’s less rigid than the Oyster bracelet which gives it a more elegant, jewelry-like feel. And the way the polished center links catch the light is beautiful.

The Rolex Jubilee didn’t stay exclusive to the Datejust for long. In 1959, Rolex fitted it to the newly introduced GMT-Master, a pilot’s watch designed for international travelers. The combination of a tool watch and a dressy Jubilee bracelet was a bold move, but it worked.

The polished center links added a touch of refinement to an otherwise rugged timepiece, making it the perfect travel companion for those who appreciated both function and style.

Over the years, the Jubilee bracelet has undergone a few subtle changes. Early versions from the 1950s and 60s had folded links, meaning the metal was rolled and folded over itself to form each link, giving the bracelet a light and slightly “jangly” feel.

In the late 1970s, Rolex upgraded to solid links, giving the bracelet a more substantial and durable feel on the wrist. They also introduced a hidden Crownclasp, allowing the clasp to blend seamlessly with the design so that it looked like an unbroken band around the wrist/

The Jubilee did take a bit of a backseat in the Rolex sports watch lineup for a while. By the late 1980s, Rolex was favoring the sportier Oyster bracelet for models like the Submariner and GMT-Master.

The Jubilee, meanwhile, remained the hallmark of dress watches like the Datejust. But then, in 2018, Rolex did something unexpected and brought the Jubilee back to the GMT-Master II.

When the Pepsi GMT-Master II (ref. 126710BLRO) was introduced with a Jubilee bracelet many of us collectors were shocked, but in the best way.

Suddenly, the Jubilee was cool again, not just for dress watches, but for sports watches too. Rolex followed up with a Batman GMT (ref. 126710BLNR) on a Jubilee in 2019, confirming that the bracelet was now a legitimate option for their most iconic tool watches.

And that’s what makes the Jubilee bracelet so special — it effortlessly walks the line between formal and casual. On a Datejust, it’s pure elegance. On a GMT-Master, it’s a conversation starter. It’s also one of the most comfortable bracelets Rolex has ever produced.

The way the five-piece links conform to the wrist makes it feel like a piece of jewelry rather than a watch strap. And despite its delicate appearance, the Jubilee is built like a tank.

The Rolex President vs Jubilee: How to Choose

When it comes to Rolex, the bracelet isn’t just an afterthought, it’s an essential part of the watch’s identity. Rolex puts just as much engineering and craftsmanship into its bracelets as it does into its movements and cases.

And when we’re talking about high-end Rolex models, two bracelets arguably stand above the rest: the President and the Jubilee.

Both have a rich history, both are unmistakably Rolex, and both offer a level of comfort and luxury that other brands have tried and failed to replicate. But they also have their own personality, their own exclusive models, and their own appeal. So, how do you choose between the two?

The Design and Look

First things first — how do these two bracelets actually look on the wrist?

The President bracelet feels like a power move. It’s made up of three semi-circular, polished links that give it a very distinct and solid presence.

There’s a certain weightiness to the design too, both literally and figuratively. It’s bold, it’s eye-catching, and it’s dripping in luxury. The high-polish center links shine like jewelry, making the President bracelet the ultimate status symbol.

The Jubilee bracelet, on the other hand, is a bit more understated. It has a five-link construction, two brushed outer links and three smaller polished center links, that creates a beautifully intricate texture around the wrist.

Unlike the President, which feels powerful and solid, the Jubilee drapes like silk. It’s elegant, dressy, and has a delicate sparkle that catches the light in just the right way.

Which Watches Can You Get Them On?

You can’t just put a President bracelet on any old Rolex. It’s exclusive. And that’s part of its allure. It was designed specifically for the Rolex Day-Date when it launched in 1956 and to this day, it remains exclusive to the Day-Date collection and a few select Lady-Datejust models.

It also only comes in precious metals including solid 18k gold and platinum. There are no steel versions. It’s this exclusivity that makes the President feel a bit more elusive and exclusive.

The Jubilee bracelet, meanwhile, is far more versatile. It made its debut on the Datejust in 1945 but has since spread its wings. It now graces a variety of Rolex models, including the Datejust, GMT-Master II, and even certain Sky-Dweller references. You can also get it in stainless steel, two-tone (Rolesor), or solid gold, depending on the model.

Which Rolex Bracelet Is Right For You?

If you’ve got your heart set on a Rolex Day-Date, then your choice is made for you – it’s coming on a President bracelet. No exceptions. The Day-Date and the President bracelet are a package deal, and frankly, they couldn’t be a better match.

But if you’re looking at something like a Datejust, GMT-Master II, or Sky-Dweller, you’ve got a bit more freedom. These models often come with the option of a Jubilee bracelet, or in some cases, an Oyster bracelet, giving you a bit more room to choose what suits you best.

Another thing to keep in mind, and something many watch wearers don’t think about but should, is how they feel on the wrist. The President bracelet has some serious weight to it, especially if you’re going for solid gold or platinum.

It’s heavy, solid, and there’s absolutely no mistaking that you’ve got a Rolex on your wrist. The semi-circular three-link design hugs your wrist nicely, but it’s still got a noticeable presence. For a lot of people, that’s exactly what they want, a reassuring weight that screams luxury and success.

The Jubilee, on the other hand, is lighter and feels a little more like silk on your wrist. Thanks to its five-piece link construction, it has this fluid, almost liquid-like drape that is undeniably comfortable and dressy.

It’s also a lot less bulky which makes it perfect for all-day wear, especially if you’re the type who doesn’t love the feeling of a heavy watch weighing down your wrist. It’s subtle, it’s comfortable, and it’s got just enough sparkle to feel special without being too flashy.

So who’s the President bracelet really for? Well, if you’re someone who wants their watch to make a statement, this is it.

The President bracelet doesn’t do subtle. It’s bold, luxurious, and carries the weight of history. When you wear a Day-Date with a President bracelet, people notice. It’s deeply tied to power and prestige and it gives that “I’ve made it” energy/

The Jubilee bracelet has a very different vibe. It’s still luxurious, but in a quieter, more versatile way. It doesn’t shout for attention like the President does and instead has an effortless classiness about it.

The five-piece links give it a bit of flash, especially on two-tone models, but it still feels subtle enough to wear every single day. And that’s one of the biggest advantages of the Jubilee, it transitions seamlessly from casual to formal without missing a beat.

It’s also worth mentioning that if you’re eyeing a GMT-Master II with a Pepsi or Batman bezel, the Jubilee bracelet is a total game-changer. It adds this beautiful vintage-meets-modern aesthetic that feels completely different from the more utilitarian look of the Oyster bracelet.

Conclusion

Ultimately, choosing between the Rolex President and Jubilee bracelet comes down to the kind of presence you want your watch to have.

The President bracelet is bold, luxurious, and carries a weight, both physically and symbolically, that few other watch bracelets can match. It’s the choice for those who want their watch to feel like a statement piece, something that exudes power and status.

Meanwhile, the Rolex Jubilee offers a quieter, more versatile kind of luxury. It’s refined, effortlessly comfortable, and can move from casual to formal with ease. We’re pretty sure that no matter which Rolex bracelet you choose, you’re going to be very happy. It’s a Rolex at the end of the day, so there’s really no such thing as a wrong choice.

rolex 5512 vs 5513

What is the world’s most famous dive watch? I don’t have the answer, but I’m certain the Rolex Submariner is somewhere near the top of the list. It’s a model that’s far from just some reliable dive watch – although it’s certainly that too – but a cultural icon and one of the most highly collectible timepieces of all time.   

The Rolex Submariner is not new, having launched back in 1953, so as you’d expect, there’s a plethora of old and new models out there. But if you were to ask me, two of the most iconic models in the Submariner’s lineup are the references 5512 and 5513. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

These vintage classics represent the golden age of Rolex’s dive watches, and while they may look nearly identical at first glance, there’s a lot hiding beneath the surface that sets them apart. 

Both models feature the signature 40mm stainless steel case, crown guards, rotating bezel, and time-only black dials that define the early Submariner aesthetic. They also share the robust acrylic crystals that marked the pre-sapphire era, making them quintessential vintage pieces. 

But the 5512 and 5513 are different in more ways than you might expect. So, if you’re wondering what the differences are between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 and you’re deciding which vintage model to get for yourself, we suggest you keep reading… 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 

Rolex Submariner 5512 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 is an important model in the history of the Swiss watchmaker, as it marked a rather major turning point in both the design and functionality of the Submariner collection. Introduced in 1959, the 5512 was the first Submariner to feature crown guards, a bold innovation that set the stage for the modern dive watch as we know it. 

Before the 5512, Submariners lacked protective shoulders around the winding crown, leaving it vulnerable to damage from accidental knocks. By adding crown guards, Rolex not only made the Submariner more durable but also expanded the case size from 38mm to 40mm, giving the watch its iconic proportions.

What makes the 5512 even more fascinating is the evolution of its crown guard design. Early models were fitted with square crown guards, a style Rolex quickly abandoned due to its impracticality and aesthetics. 

Next came the pointed crown guards, which were produced until 1963, when the more familiar rounded crown guards were introduced. These variations, particularly the rare square and pointed crown guards, are highly prized by collectors today. 

The Submariner 5512 was also notable for its technical advancements. Early examples were powered by the Caliber 1530 movement, which was not chronometer-certified. These models also featured dials with only two lines of text indicating the water resistance and the Submariner name. 

However, this changed when Rolex transitioned to the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570, both chronometer-certified movements. With this upgrade, the dials gained two additional lines of text to indicate the watch’s chronometer status, creating the now-famous “four-line” dial. 

Aesthetically, the 5512 is a quintessential vintage Submariner. Its stainless steel case is robust and functional, while the rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert provides a practical 60-minute scale for divers. 

Early models featured gilt-gloss dials, which were later replaced by matte dials, marking the shift from a more decorative to a more utilitarian look. The luminous markers on the dials were initially made with radium, but Rolex eventually transitioned to tritium for safety reasons. 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 was in production for an impressive two decades, officially ceasing in 1978. Over its lifespan, it remained a watch designed with professional divers in mind but gained popularity far beyond the diving community. Today, its enduring appeal lies in its perfect balance of vintage charm, technical innovation, and historical significance.

The Rolex Submariner 5513 

Rolex Submariner 5513

The Rolex Submariner 5513 was launched a couple of years later, in 1962, as the sibling to the 5512. While the two models appear nearly identical at a glance, the 5513 carved out its own legacy as the non-chronometer-certified version of Rolex’s iconic dive watch. 

This distinction was reflected in its use of the Caliber 1530 and later the Caliber 1520, both of which were simpler, non-chronometer movements. By comparison, the 5512, with its chronometer-certified calibers, bore additional text on its dial proclaiming its superior precision. 

The dial of the 5513 is one of its defining features. Early examples sported the minimalist two-line configuration, emphasizing the Submariner name and depth rating, giving it a clean and understated appearance. 

These early models also featured gilt-gloss dials, a hallmark of the era, and were fitted with pointed crown guards, a design shared with the 5512 of the same period. As production continued, Rolex transitioned to matte black dials with painted hour markers and, later still, glossy black dials with white gold surrounds on the markers. 

In terms of the case and bezel, the 5513 retained the 40mm stainless steel construction that has become synonymous with the Submariner. Its rotating bezel, featuring a black aluminum insert with a 0-60-minute scale, also remained, as did the watch’s acrylic crystal glass and the luminous material on its dial and hands, which shifted from radium in the earliest examples to the safer tritium in later models. 

The 5513’s longevity is another remarkable aspect of its history. While the 5512 ceased production in the late 1970s, the 5513 continued to be manufactured until 1989, making it one of the longest-running Submariner references. 

This extended production period means that collectors can often find a wide range of variations, from early gilt dials with rare features to later models with more contemporary design elements. 

The Rolex Submariner 5513 is also well known for its cultural significance. It was famously worn by Sean Connery’s James Bond in Dr. No and Goldfinger, cementing its status as an icon not just of horology but also of popular culture. This association with 007 has only added to its allure among vintage watch enthusiasts.

Rolex Submariner 5512 vs 5513 – How to Choose 

When deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513, you’re faced with two iconic models that look incredibly similar at first glance. 

However, as we’ve touched on already, there are some key differences under the surface that can guide your choice. So what exactly sets these two vintage Submariners apart, and which one will suit your needs best? 

Movement: Chronometer vs. Non-Chronometer

The most significant difference between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 lies in their movements. The Submariner 5512 was fitted with chronometer-certified movements, starting with the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570. 

These movements met Rolex’s exacting standards for precision, which is why the 5512 dials bear the “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text, also known as the “four-line dial.”

In contrast, the 5513 was designed as a simpler, non-chronometer version. It began with the Caliber 1530 and transitioned to the Caliber 1520. Its dials feature only two lines of text, giving it a cleaner and more understated appearance. 

While the differences in performance may not be noticeable to a casual wearer, collectors often place a premium on the chronometer status of the 5512.

Rarity and Availability

The production periods of these models also contribute to their differences in rarity. The 5512 was introduced in 1959 and discontinued in 1978, giving it a relatively shorter production run. This means fewer 5512 examples exist in the market today, making it a rarer and more exclusive choice.

The 5513, on the other hand, enjoyed a much longer production run from 1962 to 1989. As a result, it’s often easier to find a 5513 in various conditions and configurations, offering more options for collectors and enthusiasts alike.

Aesthetics and Design

Both the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 share the classic 40mm stainless steel case, rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert, and vintage acrylic crystal. Early examples of both models feature gilt-gloss dials and pointed crown guards, while later iterations transitioned to matte dials with painted markers and, eventually, glossy dials with white gold surrounds.

The main visual difference lies in the dial text: the 5512’s four-line dial versus the 5513’s simpler two-line configuration. This distinction makes the 5512 feel slightly more technical and prestigious, while the 5513 offers a cleaner, minimalist aesthetic that other collectors will prefer.

Price Considerations

The chronometer-certified 5512 has historically been more expensive than the 5513 owing to its higher level of technical achievement and shorter production run. However, the price gap can also depend on the specific model variation, condition, and rarity. 

Early examples with gilt dials or unique features like square crown guards can command significant premiums, regardless of the reference.

For the budget-conscious collector, the 5513 may present a more accessible entry point into the world of vintage Submariners. Its longer production run means there’s a greater variety of options, from early gilt-dial models to later glossy-dial versions.

Which One Should You Pick?

Deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 ultimately comes down to your personal priorities as a collector or enthusiast. 

Each model offers unique qualities that cater to different tastes and preferences, making this choice a matter of what you value most in a vintage watch.

If exclusivity and technical prowess top your list, the Rolex Submariner 5512 is going to be the better fit for you. With its chronometer-certified movement and the coveted “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text on its dial, the 5512 stands as a testament to Rolex’s precision and attention to detail. 

Its shorter production run also adds an element of rarity, making it a sought-after piece for collectors who prioritize historical significance and exclusivity.

On the other hand, the Rolex Submariner 5513 is ideal for those drawn to simplicity and timeless design. Its two-line dial offers a clean, minimalist aesthetic that has a charm all of its own. 

It also had a longer production run spanning nearly three decades, so it provides plenty more options to collectors, so you have more chance of choosing from early gilt-dial examples to later glossy-dial variations.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 is a decision that reflects your unique priorities as a collector or enthusiast. Each model holds its own special place in the history of Rolex, offering distinct characteristics that make them both highly desirable. 

The 5512 stands out with its chronometer-certified movement and rarity, while the 5513 captures attention with its clean, timeless design and wide-ranging options.

Owning either reference is a privilege, as both showcase the unparalleled craftsmanship and enduring appeal that has defined Rolex for generations. 

For many, myself included, these two references mark the end of the classic vintage Submariner era. Being able to glance at your wrist and be reminded of this—especially when so many others are choosing modern-day Rolex Submariners—is truly a special experience.

With the insights shared here, you’re now equipped to choose the Rolex Submariner that aligns best with your personal tastes and values. The 5512 and 5513 each bring something unique to the table, and either one would make a remarkable addition to any collection

tudor ranger vs rolex explorer

When it comes to robust, utilitarian tool watches, there is no shortage of models to choose from. But two that often stand out are the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger. Both are no-nonsense watches built for the outdoors, boasting super-legible dials, rugged construction, and an undeniable air of capability. 

In fact, put them side by side, and it’s easy to get them confused, at least at first glance. But don’t be fooled; while they may look like close cousins (and they are since Rolex and Tudor share the same parent company), these two timepieces come with a lot of differences. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

Rolex, the elder sibling, has a global reputation. It’s the brand synonymous with luxury and achievement, and the Explorer is its understated nod to those who seek adventure without sacrificing style. 

Tudor, on the other hand, is Rolex’s more accessible sibling, known for offering high-quality watches at a more bank-friendly price point. The Ranger reflects that ethos perfectly, delivering the same utilitarian spirit but with a slightly different approach to design.

So, which one should you pick? In this guide, we’ll compare the Tudor Explorer and the Rolex Ranger in detail, highlighting their similarities, differences, and the reasons why each could be the perfect fit for your next adventure.

The Tudor Ranger Collection 

Tudor Ranger Collection

The history of the Tudor Ranger is a little puzzling as there are many parts of the story to consider, but that’s what makes this watch all the more fascinating. The Tudor Ranger we know today was bought back in 2022 to mark 70 years since the British North Greenland Expedition, but its name actually goes way further back. 

Hans Wilsdorf, the man behind Rolex and Tudor, registered it in 1929, but for decades, “Ranger” wasn’t a specific model. Instead, it was more of an idea, like a way to describe a watch that was built for adventure. 

The 1950s were when things started to click into place. Several Tudor watches accompanied the British North Greenland Expedition, a grueling trek across the Arctic. 

The expedition officially used the Oyster Prince, but its rugged, stripped-back design influenced what would eventually become the Ranger. Rather than being a one-to-one replica, the Ranger captured the spirit of reliability in extreme conditions. 

By the 1960s, the Tudor Ranger was finally standing on its own, with a clear identity inclusive of bold, luminous numerals, tough cases, and those signature arrow hands. 

Over the years, it adapted to the times and added features like date windows and improved technology but always stayed true to its utilitarian roots. Fast forward to today, and the Ranger still carries that adventurous vibe, blending old-school practicality with modern tech. 

The Tudor Ranger is a field watch that thrives on simplicity and functionality, making it the perfect companion for adventurers and minimalists alike. 

First introduced in the 1960s, it was created with a clear purpose: to be a tough, reliable timepiece that could withstand demanding environments while remaining easy to use. Decades later, the modern Tudor Ranger stays true to that original vision, combining rugged durability with thoughtful design. 

At the heart of the Ranger is the Tudor Calibre MT5402, a COSC-certified automatic movement with an impressive 70-hour power reserve. This movement ensures the watch is as dependable as it is precise, whether you’re trekking through wilderness or simply going about your daily routine. 

The 39mm stainless steel case also strikes a perfect balance between wearability and durability, with a domed sapphire crystal that resists scratches while adding a subtle vintage touch. 

At the moment, the Tudor Ranger only comes with a matte black dial, which feels like the sensible choice, as it keeps things clean and legible. The dial is largely defined by the bold Arabic numerals marking 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock and the bold and sharp arrow-shaped hands, including a red-tipped seconds hand that stands out beautifully against the black backdrop. 

The modern-day Tudor Ranger collection is relatively small, but that attests largely to its recent release in 2022. It also means that if you’re someone easily overwhelmed with choice, the Tudor Ranger family is going to make things easier for you. 

Currently, the collection features just three models, each with the same core features: a 39mm stainless steel case that’s durable yet wearable, a scratch-resistant domed sapphire crystal, and a matte black dial with bold Arabic numerals at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock for excellent legibility. 

All three models are also powered by the same reliable Tudor Calibre MT5402, a COSC-certified automatic movement boasting an impressive 70-hour power reserve. 

The options differ in the straps, giving each watch its own distinct personality. For those who appreciate a classic look, there’s the model with a three-row stainless steel bracelet, which combines toughness with refined style. The second option features a hybrid rubber and leather strap, perfect for those who want a comfortable, sporty vibe that can easily handle active days. 

And then there’s my personal favorite, the Tudor Ranger with a fabric strap. This one features a striped design in red, khaki green, and beige, adding a touch of vintage charm that feels effortlessly outdoorsy.

The Rolex Explorer Collection 

Rolex Explorer Collection

The Rolex Explorer holds a special place in watchmaking history as it is widely known as one of the best-known explorer watches out there. Introduced in 1953, it was a response to the first successful ascent of Mount Everest by Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay. 

While there’s debate over whether an Explorer or its “Pre-Explorer” predecessor made it to the summit, what’s certain is that Rolex used the expedition as the foundation for a watch designed to conquer extremes. 

The Everest expedition was obviously a huge example of human triumph, but it was also a showcase of Rolex’s ground-breaking engineering. For years, the brand had been equipping explorers with its Oyster Perpetual models to test in the harshest environments. 

The feedback gained from these expeditions directly influenced the development of the Explorer, resulting in a watch that could endure punishing conditions while delivering unmatched reliability. 

The connection between the Explorer and exploration has become intrinsic to its identity, with the watch being worn by adventurers tackling everything from icy peaks to scorching deserts. 

And because of that, the Rolex Explorer’s story has grown into something of a legend. It was one of the models that marked a turning point for Rolex, solidifying the brand as a leader in crafting timepieces that combine precision, durability, and purpose. 

The Rolex Explorer is celebrated for its refined simplicity and purposeful design, elements that have remained central to its character since its debut. While the watch has evolved over the decades, it has stayed true to its origins as a reliable tool watch built for extreme conditions. 

Introduced in 1953, the Explorer’s legacy began with its rugged Oyster case, crafted from Rolex’s proprietary Oystersteel. This material ensures durability and corrosion resistance, while the hermetically sealed Oyster case guarantees water resistance up to 100 meters. 

The case’s smooth bezel and balanced proportions make it not only robust but also visually elegant, embodying Rolex’s commitment to merging form with function. 

A hallmark of the Explorer is its iconic black dial with 3, 6, and 9 numerals and cathedral hands. It’s a design built to prioritize legibility in all environments. Rolex’s proprietary Chromalight luminescent material further enhances visibility, offering a brilliant white hue in daylight and an intense blue glow in darkness. 

Complementing the Explorer’s classic design is the advanced engineering behind its movement. Modern models are powered by the Rolex Calibre 3230, a self-winding mechanical movement with a blue Parachrom hairspring, resistant to shocks, temperature fluctuations, and magnetic fields. The patented Chronergy escapement ensures energy efficiency, contributing to a power reserve of approximately 70 hours. 

The Explorer II, an extension of the collection, adds a practical twist for globetrotters and adventurers. Featuring a 24-hour bezel and a brightly colored GMT hand, it allows wearers to track two timezones simultaneously. 

It also swaps out the iconic Arabic numerals for rounded indices and adds a magnified date window at 3 o’clock. This additional functionality enhances the Explorer’s versatility while retaining the rugged spirit of the original. 

The modern Rolex Explorer collection offers much more variety compared to the Tudor Ranger, making it easier to find a piece that suits your personal style and needs. The Explorer 40 and Explorer 36, both in Oystersteel, bring the rugged durability and unmistakable elegance Rolex is known for. 

The 40mm size offers a slightly larger presence, while the 36mm version has a more classic, understated feel which will no doubt attract the wrists of all genders. Both versions feature the iconic black dial with large Arabic numerals, ensuring legibility in any condition. 

For those drawn to a touch of luxury, the Explorer 36 in Oystersteel and yellow gold stands out with its two-tone design. Yellow gold accents on the bezel, crown, and inner bracelet links give it a refined look while still staying true to the Explorer’s functional roots. It’s the perfect blend of adventure-ready and elegant. 

Then, there’s the Explorer II, which adds an extra level of versatility. At 42mm, it’s slightly larger, offering a more substantial feel on the wrist. The 24-hour bezel and GMT hand also provide easy tracking of a second timezone, so it’s an ideal one for travelers. The Explorer II comes with two dial options, classic black or the striking white “Polar” dial, which adds a fresh, bold look to the collection.

Tudor Ranger vs Rolex Explorer – How to Choose 

When comparing the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger, the most obvious distinction lies in the number of options available. The Tudor Ranger collection is quite limited, with just three models currently on offer, all of which share a similar core design and differ primarily in their strap choices. 

On the other hand, the Rolex Explorer offers more variety, with several case sizes, materials, and even complications to choose from. Although the Explorer collection is still modest compared to some other luxury watchmakers’ vast portfolios, it definitely provides a wider selection than the Tudor Ranger.

Case Sizes and Design

The Rolex Explorer I comes in two case sizes: the Explorer 40 and the Explorer 36, allowing for a more customizable fit depending on wrist size and personal preference. The 40mm size is ideal for those who like a bit more presence on the wrist, while the 36mm version caters to those who prefer a more classic, understated look. 

There’s also a Rolex Explorer II model with a 42mm case, adding even more options in terms of size and presence. In contrast, the Tudor Ranger sticks to a single case size of 39mm, making it more consistent but less versatile for those who like to choose between sizes.

The design of both watches shares some similarities, particularly their clear, legible dials with Arabic numerals at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock. However, the Rolex Explorer typically has a slightly more refined aesthetic, with its signature Mercedes hands and high-end finishes that exude luxury. The Tudor Ranger has a more utilitarian feel, with a more straightforward dial layout and the trademark snowflake hands.

Materials and Durability

The Rolex Explorer uses higher-end materials throughout, such as Oystersteel (a proprietary stainless steel developed by Rolex) and yellow gold options. The Explorer’s case is designed to withstand the harshest environments, and the materials used reflect its robust, luxury tool watch status. 

The use of Chromalight on the dial for improved luminescence is another luxury touch that differentiates it from the Tudor Ranger. Tudor, while owned by Rolex, opts for a more accessible range of materials. The Tudor Ranger uses stainless steel and has a simpler, but still durable, design.

Movement Technology

When it comes to the movements, the Rolex Explorer takes the lead with its sophisticated in-house calibers, such as the Caliber 3230 in the latest models. 

This self-winding movement is renowned for its precision and durability, featuring innovations like the Chronergy escapement for improved efficiency and Parachrom hairspring for resistance to magnetic fields and shocks. It also boasts a power reserve of up to 70 hours, ensuring reliability for long periods without winding.

In comparison, the Tudor Ranger uses the Tudor Caliber MT5402 movement, which is also an in-house automatic movement but one not quite as advanced as Rolex’s latest technology. 

While still offering a respectable 70-hour power reserve and COSC certification for accuracy, it lacks some of the features found in Rolex’s movements, like the proprietary Parachrom hairspring and enhanced escapement.

Complications and Features

The Rolex Explorer II adds an extra layer of functionality to the Explorer collection with its 24-hour bezel and GMT hand, allowing wearers to track two time zones at once. This makes the Explorer II an optimal choice for frequent travelers or those who like having additional functionality in their watches. The Tudor Ranger, on the other hand, stays true to its minimalist design focusing purely on telling the time.

Price and Availability

One of the most significant differences between the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger is the price. The Tudor Ranger is far more affordable, retailing from around $3,150, making it a great entry point for those who want a robust tool watch without breaking the bank. 

Meanwhile, the Rolex Explorer starts at $7,350 for the base model and can climb as high as $11,000 for versions made from solid gold.

Availability also plays a major role. Tudor Rangers are relatively easier to obtain, with less of a wait time, as they are produced in higher quantities. In contrast, the Rolex Explorer often has long waiting lists, especially for brand-new pieces from authorized dealers. This adds an element of scarcity to the Explorer, which, for some buyers, may make it more desirable.

Which One is Right for You?

Deciding between the Tudor Ranger and the Rolex Explorer ultimately comes down to what you prioritize in a watch. If you value affordability and accessibility, the Tudor Ranger might be the ideal choice. 

Its minimalist design, simplicity, and rugged build make it perfect for those who want a solid, no-nonsense tool watch that doesn’t have the complications or luxury materials of more expensive options.

On the other hand, the Rolex Explorer is for those who appreciate craftsmanship, luxury materials, and the legacy linked to Rolex. It also offers a more versatile collection with different case sizes, materials, and even complications in the Explorer II model, so it’s going to be best suited to those that have smaller wrists, more particular tastes, or just a love of options.

Conclusion

Both the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger are fantastic tool watches and easily two of the best on the market.  The Rolex Explorer stands out for its superior materials, advanced technology, and wider range of options, making it a top choice for those seeking a luxurious, high-performance explorer’s watch.

Nevertheless, the Tudor Ranger is a fantastic alternative for those who prioritize affordability and accessibility without compromising on durability and design.

While it may lack the refined features of the Rolex, it still offers a rugged, dependable experience, making it the better choice for anyone looking for a great tool watch at a more approachable price.

tudor pelagos vs black bay

Let’s be honest: when someone says “Tudor,” chances are the first watch that comes to mind is the Black Bay. It’s the Swiss watchmaker’s flagship collection and the watch that put Tudor back on the map when it launched in 2012. 

It’s got that vintage charm, the nods to Tudor’s heritage, and oozes versatility. But while the Black Bay might be soaking up most of the spotlight, there’s another Tudor timepiece that deserves just as much love: the Pelagos. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

Now, don’t get me wrong, the Tudor Pelagos is not here to play second fiddle, it’s here to carve out its own identity. Still a dive watch, the Pelagos is a modern tool-watch powerhouse with impressive functionality and design that varies from its Black Bay sibling. 

Where the Black Bay leans into its retro-inspired charm, the Pelagos takes a modern approach with a lightweight titanium case and a serious water-resistant rating. 

What’s great about Tudor today, compared to, say, a decade ago, is how spoiled for choice we are. Both the Black Bay and Pelgaos collections have plenty of references for us to choose from. S,o without further ado, let’s compare these two dive watches and discuss the many options on the table.

The Tudor Pelagos Collection

The Tudor Pelagos Collection

When Tudor introduced the Pelagos alongside the Black Bay at Baselworld 2012, it marked a turning point for the brand. Tudor was on the brink of its grand re-entry after nearly a decade-long hiatus, and the release of these two dive watches underscored the company’s resurgence. 

Over the years, the Black Bay has become Tudor’s flagship, offering a wide variety of models to suit different tastes. In contrast, the Pelagos has followed a more focused path, staying true to its roots as a no-nonsense tool watch with only a handful of updates. 

The Pelagos, named after the Greek word for “open seas,” debuted as Tudor’s most technical dive watch. The first model, the Pelagos 25500TN, which launched in 2012, featured a 42mm titanium case, a helium escape valve at 9 o’clock, and a ceramic bezel. These specs made it a serious contender for professional divers. It was originally powered by an ETA-based automatic movement as at this point, Tudor still hadn’t dipped their toes into the in-house movement game. 

In 2015, the Pelagos received a significant upgrade with the introduction of the 25600TN (black) and 25600TB (blue) models. These watches were equipped with Tudor’s new in-house MT5612 movement, which added a “Chronometer Officially Certified” designation to the dial.

This evolution emphasized Tudor’s shift toward independence in watchmaking while reinforcing the Pelagos as a serious diving instrument. 

Another notable addition came in 2016 with the Pelagos LHD (Left Hand Drive). Inspired by vintage Tudor Submariners made for the French Navy, this model flipped the crown to the left side, catering to left-handed divers.

The LHD also introduced unique color accents and a slightly more stylized aesthetic, giving it a distinct identity within the collection. 

At its core, the Tudor Pelagos is built for performance. Its lightweight titanium case ensures comfort even at 42mm, while its 500-meter water resistance and helium escape valve make it suitable for saturation diving. 

The ceramic bezel is luminous and durable, perfect for low-light underwater conditions. The watch also features a spring-loaded clasp that automatically adjusts for pressure changes during dives. The latter is a really clever innovation rarely seen elsewhere. 

Today, the Pelagos collection offers several variations to suit different preferences while maintaining its tool-watch DNA: 

  • Classic Pelagos (42mm): The classic and original Pelagos is currently available in black or blue dial and bezel options, paired with a 42mm titanium case and bracelet. Its ceramic rotating bezel, robust build, and 500-meter water resistance make it a go-to for divers who demand reliability.
  • Pelagos 39: Released as a smaller alternative, the Pelagos 39 offers a sleeker and more wearable design while retaining many of the core features of its larger sibling. It’s perfect for those who want the Pelagos’ functionality in a more compact package. 
  • Pelagos LHD: The Left Hand Drive (LHD) variant stands out with its left-side crown and vintage-inspired styling. It retains the same impressive specs as the classic models, including the titanium case and ceramic bezel, while adding a unique touch of vintage character. 
  • Pelagos FXD: The FXD sub-collection takes the Pelagos’ utility to the next level. Designed for underwater navigation, the FXD features fixed strap bars for enhanced durability, a countdown bezel for mission timing, and a thinner, darker-toned titanium case. It is also exclusively paired with fabric straps, emphasizing its practical, military-inspired aesthetic.

The Black Bay Collection 

The Tudor Black Bay Collection

When someone mentions Tudor, chances are the Black Bay is the model that comes to mind. It’s Tudor’s flagship collection for a reason, seamlessly blending vintage inspiration with modern reliability and offering a staggering variety of options to suit just about anyone. While the Pelagos is a serious tool watch built for deep-sea adventures, the Black Bay is where I feel Tudor lets their creativity shine.

When Tudor introduced the Black Bay in 2012, the collection felt almost like a love letter to the brand’s storied history in dive watches. Drawing inspiration from vintage Tudor models, the Black Bay design is an amalgamation of some of the most iconic features from Tudor’s past.

The case shape, dial design, and domed crystal echo the 1954 Oyster Prince Submariner ref. 7922, while the oversized crown silhouette was inspired by the 1958 Submariner ref. 7924, nicknamed the “Big Crown.” And, of course, the bold and angular “Snowflake” hands came straight from the 1970s Tudor Submariners used by the French Navy.

The first Black Bay reference, the 79220, debuted with a distinctive burgundy bezel. It was quickly followed by models with blue and black bezels, cementing the Black Bay as a versatile and instantly recognizable dive watch. 

These early models were powered by ETA movements, a reliable workhorse in the watch world. However, in 2016, Tudor replaced the ETA-powered references with in-house movements, elevating the collection further with improved performance and precision.

Since there are so many Tudor Black Bay models in the company’s collection, it’s hard to narrow down the key features. There are a variety of case sizes, dial colors, movements, complications, and strap configurations from which to choose. But they all have a few things in common, such as domed sapphire crystal glass, unidirectional aluminum dive bezels, and a 200-meter water-resistant rating.

Where the Pelagos focuses on being a specialized tool watch, the Black Bay takes a different approach. Tudor has expanded the Black Bay into a sprawling collection with numerous configurations, case sizes, and materials. Here’s a breakdown of what’s available: 

  • Black Bay Fifty-Eight: A tribute to the classic Tudor divers of the 1950s, the Black Bay Fifty-Eight features a compact 39mm steel case, no-date dials, and options for black or blue colorways with aluminum bezels. 
  • Black Bay Steel: A traditional diver with a 41mm case, steel bezel, and date window. 
  • Black Bay S&G (Steel & Gold): These models mix steel and gold for a luxurious two-tone look, available with date windows and a variety of dial options. 
  • Black Bay Bronze: With its 43mm bronze case and no-date dial, this watch develops a unique patina over time, offering a rugged and vintage-inspired aesthetic. 
  • Black Bay P01: A quirky and bold design inspired by a 1960s Tudor prototype, the P01 features a 42mm case, a locking bezel mechanism, and a date window. 
  • Black Bay Chrono: A sporty chronograph with a 41mm case, bi-compax dials, a steel tachymeter bezel, and date function. There’s even a vibrant turquoise “Flamingo Blue” version and a bright pink sister model for those who want to make a statement. 
  • Black Bay Chrono S&G: This two-tone variant of the chronograph offers a luxurious edge, with a mix of steel and gold paired with an aluminum tachymeter bezel. 
  • Black Bay GMT: Featuring a 41mm case and a striking two-tone aluminum bezel, the Black Bay GMT offers a playful twist on the iconic “Pepsi” bezel from Rolex with options in burgundy and navy or brown and black. It also includes a 24-hour hand and a date window for frequent travelers. 
  • Black Bay 32/36/41: These are the Tudor Black Bay watches for the every day, featuring smooth bezels, cases in steel or two-tone configurations, and three case sizes to suit any wrist.

Tudor Pelagos vs Black Bay – How to Choose

It’s clear Tudor has created these two distinct dive watch collections to cater to the different needs and wants of its customer base. While both are celebrated for their exceptional craftsmanship and robust performance, they diverge in aesthetics, functionality, and audience appeal. Below, we’ll break down the key differences between the Tudor Black Bay and Pelagos across various categories, helping you decide which one aligns best with your style and requirements.

Water Resistance

One of the most significant differences between the Tudor Black Bay and Pelagos lies in their water resistance. The Pelagos is engineered for serious underwater adventures, offering an impressive 500 meters of water resistance. Its helium escape valve, positioned on the case, is a feature specifically designed for saturation divers who operate at extreme depths.

In contrast, the Black Bay, while still a capable dive watch, is rated to 200 meters. This level of water resistance is still perfectly adequate for recreational diving and everyday wear but doesn’t reach the technical depths of the Pelagos.

Case Materials

The Pelagos is a pioneer within the Tudor lineup as the brand’s first dive watch to be crafted from titanium. This material is prized for being lightweight, strong, and resistant to corrosion, making it an ideal choice for extended wear during demanding activities. Its brushed finish gives the watch a distinctly utilitarian appearance that underscores its tool-watch heritage.

The Black Bay collection, on the other hand, embraces variety in its case materials. While stainless steel is the cornerstone, the lineup also includes options in bronze, two-tone steel and gold, and PVD-coated steel. These choices make the Black Bay far more diverse in style, catering to both traditionalists and those who want something with a touch of luxury.

Straps and Bracelets

The strap options reflect the different personalities of the two collections. The Tudor Pelagos comes on a titanium bracelet with a clever spring-loaded clasp that automatically adjusts to changes in wrist size caused by pressure variations underwater. Additionally, the FXD models in the Pelagos line are exclusively paired with fabric straps, which align with their stripped-down, functional aesthetic.

The Tudor Black Bay offers significantly more variety in this department. Whether you prefer the classic feel of a stainless steel bracelet, the warmth of a leather strap, or the practicality of rubber, the Black Bay lineup has a configuration to suit your preferences. This range enhances its versatility, making it a watch that transitions effortlessly between casual and formal settings.

Aesthetic Differences

Visually, the Tudor Pelagos leans into minimalism and practicality. Its flat sapphire crystal ensures maximum legibility, while the matte ceramic bezel and bold Snowflake hands emphasize readability and functionality over decorative elements. The overall design is stark and no-nonsense, a clear reflection of its purpose as a professional-grade dive watch.

The Tudor Black Bay, however, takes a different approach. Its domed sapphire crystal glass, polished and brushed finishes, and aluminum bezel inserts give it a vintage-inspired charm that pays homage to Tudor’s dive watch heritage. While the Snowflake hands are a common feature between the two collections, they feel more decorative in the Black Bay and more of a way to complement the retro aesthetic, while also maintaining clear legibility.

Complications and Features

The Tudor Pelagos is straightforward in its approach, offering time and date functions that prioritize reliability and durability. Its design and features are tailored for professional use, and it avoids any unnecessary complications that could detract from its tool-watch identity.

The Tudor Black Bay collection, by contrast, offers a broader range of complications and features. From the practical GMT models with their dual time zone functionality to the sporty chronographs with their tachymeter bezels and timing subdials, the Black Bay lineup is designed to cater to a variety of needs. This diversity makes it a more versatile choice for those who want a watch that can do more than just dive.

Price

The Tudor Black Bay collection retails from $3,825, making it an accessible entry point into Tudor’s world of high-quality dive watches. With its variety of complications, materials, and styles, the Black Bay offers excellent value for its price, particularly for those seeking a versatile timepiece that can adapt to different occasions.

Meanwhile, the Tudor Pelagos, starting at $4,400, reflects its position as a more specialized watch. Its titanium construction, helium escape valve, and 500-meter water resistance justify this slightly higher price point, appealing to those who need a tool watch capable of withstanding extreme conditions.

Should You Choose the Tudor Black Bay or the Tudor Pelagos?

The Black Bay is an excellent choice for individuals who appreciate vintage-inspired design and a versatile timepiece. Its extensive range of sizes, materials, and complications makes it suitable for anyone, whether you’re looking for a watch to wear with a suit, on a casual day out, or during a dive. This collection is also ideal for those who value style and variety, as it offers something for almost every preference.

The Pelagos, on the other hand, is designed for the serious adventurer or diver. Its robust titanium construction, practical features, and minimalist design make it a reliable companion in extreme environments. It’s also best suited to someone who prioritizes functionality over aesthetics, someone that needs a watch that can handle demanding conditions and isn’t overly fussed by luxurious case metals like gold and bronze.

Conclusion 

Choosing between the Black Bay and Pelagos ultimately comes down to your priorities. If you’re after a stylish and versatile watch with a nod to Tudor’s rich history, the Black Bay offers endless options. Its broad range of sizes, materials, and complications ensures there’s a piece for every occasion, whether you need a daily companion, a sophisticated accessory, or a functional tool for moderate diving adventures. 

However, if you want a no-compromise tool watch built for performance, the Pelagos delivers unmatched durability and practicality. With its technical specifications, lightweight titanium construction, and features designed explicitly for professional divers, it’s a watch that excels in the harshest environments without sacrificing wearability or reliability.

Truthfully though, both collections are immaculate, and I have very little negative to say about either model. Each reflects Tudor’s dedication to craftsmanship and innovation, offering value that far exceeds their price points. Whichever watch you choose, you’ll not be disappointed.

To Top