News Archives - Page 3 of 35 - Exquisite Timepieces
iconHome Blog / News / Page 3

Category: News

tissot prx powermatic 80 review

Tissot PRX Review: The People’s Watch

Benedetto Youssef

May 18, 2025

If you ever find yourself amongst watch enthusiasts, you might learn that there are certain “genres” of watches that are needed to round out a collection. There is also category overlap, with some watches checking multiple boxes. 

Most collections necessitate a GADA, or “Go Anywhere, Do Anything” watch. For some, this may be a field watch, or a dive watch, or even a tool watch.

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

For me, I’ve always believed that the integrated steel sports watch was the perfect GADA candidate. It’s the kind of watch that works with everything, without ever feeling out of place. 

The Tissot PRX is the perfect example of this: robust, durable, stylish, and—perhaps most important…it’s affordable. A watch not only for the elite. A watch for the people.

From Conventional to Avante Garde 

Tissot PRX collection

The year was 1972. To not own and regularly wear a wristwatch would have been seen as peculiar. Wristwatches were a staple accessory, adorning the wrists of blue-collar workers and executives alike. 

In 1972, watches were mechanical and had a “classic” aesthetic, often with round cases, simple dials, and leather straps. And then came the Royal Oak—changing everything. I have to admit, if I were to close my eyes and envision a luxury sports watch, it would be the Royal Oak every time. 

Designed by Gérald Genta and released in 1972, the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak was the first true luxury sports watch. This iconic design inspired and legitimized an entirely new genre—one that broke free from the conventions of delicate and derivative dress watches. 

The Royal Oak didn’t just shift tastes; it ushered in an avant-garde era of watchmaking, shifting the entire industry in new and exciting directions. And you might be asking yourself right now: Why so much on the Royal Oak? I thought this was about the Tissot PRX.

As previously mentioned, the Royal Oak inspired an entire genre of watches—the integrated steel sports watch. Tissot, being a titan of the Swiss watch industry, though with far more accessible prices, released the Seastar “PRX” in 1978. 

It would be hard to argue that this quartz timepiece was not directly inspired by Genta’s Royal Oak, and though it had a relatively short shelf life due to the quartz crisis, Tissot revived the iconic watch in 2021 with the PRX. The watch has been a huge commercial success for them, and I personally am an enormous fan of the modern iteration. It truly is the “people’s watch.”

Case

Along with the bracelet, the case of the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is the star of the show. Available in two sizes, 40mm and 35mm, the PRX is appropriate for virtually all wrists, both men and women.

Given that integrated bracelet watches typically have much shorter lug-to-lug measurements—44mm and 39mm in this case—they’ll actually wear smaller than their dimensions might lead you to expect. 

So, if you usually wear a 38mm, don’t shy away from the 40mm PRX. Across the lineup, the stainless steel case is beautifully brushed with polished chamfered edges, offering good contrast and superior light play. 

There are PVD-coated yellow and rose gold options, too. There are even models with 14k gold fluted bezels, if you wanted something a bit more dressy. Finally, if you are into “exotic” materials, the recently released black and grey marbled forged carbon case is an absolute stunner. You have to see and hold it in person to really appreciate it! 

The PRX does not have a screw-down crown, though its crown is signed with Tissot’s signature “T.” It still offers a robust 100m of water resistance, more than virtually anyone using the watch will ever need. 

Beyond that, the exhibition caseback offers a clear picture of the Powermatic 80 automatic movement. Sapphire crystals are used for the dial across the model range.

Offering a bit beyond the “spec sheet”, here, I have to admit that I was a bit skeptical of the PRX before holding one in the flesh. The fit and finish are beyond anything I expected in the sub $1000 range. You really have to see one in person to appreciate the full breadth of these watches! 

Dial

The PRX Powermatic 80 offers a variety of colors and a brilliantly executed waffle dial. Every shade of blue is available, from deep to ice blue and even a new gradient blue dial. There are greens and gold and white and black and on and on. Too many to list here, but there is certainly a color for every palette. 

I myself am partial to the green dial—but green is my favorite color, so I am biased. The only dials without the waffle texture are those with the 18k fluted bezel, available in a “sunburst” untextured blue, silver, or brown dial. The forged carbon PRX has a black carbon dial, untextured as well.

Baton indices line the outer portion of the dial, in lieu of Arabic numerals. The indices are filled with Superluminova for superior low-light visibility, which is an absolute necessity for my everyday watches. 

A date—not color matching, which sort of irks me, but isn’t the end of the world—window is located at the 3 o’clock, regardless of model. Baton-style hands, also filled with a healthy amount of lume, allow for easy visibility and time-telling.

Movement

I remember when Swatch Group first released their Powermatic movement. Industry professionals were upset when Swatch acquired ETA and released the Powermatic movement, fearing a monopoly on Swiss watch movements. The Powermatic, with its impressive 80-hour power reserve, was seen as far superior to standard off-the-shelf Swiss movements, which typically offered just a 38-hour reserve. 

This Powermatic 80, exclusive to Swatch Group, features a modified ETA 2824-2 base, optimized for longer autonomy while maintaining high accuracy. If you flip the PRX Powermatic 80 over, you can view the movement.

It’s not necessarily the most beautiful movement in the world, but it is functional and pretty damn accurate to boot: +/- 15 seconds per day, which is far superior to most watches—be them Swiss, Japanese, or otherwise—within the sub $1,000 price range.

Straps

I always suggest buying the PRX Powermatic 80 on the bracelet, which has a beautifully articulated and crafted stainless steel integrated design. Sure, you can buy the watch on the rubber strap or leather strap, but the star of the show is the bracelet, and it is much more expensive to source than a strap would be. 

Another thing worth mentioning: You can’t simply buy any strap for these watches. Though the 40mm version has a lug width of 21mm, and the 35mm version has an 18mm lug width, the integrated design requires a proprietary strap from Tissot.

On-Wrist Experience

Sublime. Next question.

I’ve handled many integrated steel sports watches—from AP and Bvlgari to Maurice Lacroix and Oris. Sure, wearing a $30,000 watch has that extra “wow” factor, and I was very skeptical when Tissot first released the PRX. 

At the price point, I was expecting something clunky and unrefined, like many of the cheap fashion watches that try, but fail, to imitate luxury integrated steel sports watches.

I was given a 40mm blue-dialed PRX to try for a week. I loved it so much. It maintained +6 seconds per day, which was totally impressive, and I took it swimming, golfing, hiking, and desk diving. 

It performed through every task, and after a while, it became “part” of my wrist, so much so that I purchased my own 40mm green dialed version.

I have also tried the 35mm version, and it didn’t look too small or dainty on my 6.5-inch wrists, so I am sure almost anyone could pull it off (bear-wristed fellas need not apply!).

Price & Availability

The PRX Powermatic 80 lineup now includes both 40mm and 35mm versions with waffle dials, priced at $725 and $695, respectively, when purchased on the integrated stainless steel bracelet.

If you opt for a leather or rubber strap instead, you can shave a bit off the price, though I’d argue the bracelet is half the appeal. 

For something a little more elevated, the 18k gold fluted bezel models come in at $1,850 and trade the waffle for a clean sunburst dial.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, the forged carbon PRX is the boldest of the bunch—matte, marbled, and coming in at $995. All versions feature the Powermatic 80 movement, sapphire crystal, and 100m of water resistance. 

The integrated design wears comfortably in both sizes, and the overall quality punches well above its price. Whether you go classic or contemporary, there’s a PRX that’ll feel right at home on your wrist. 

The best place to purchase a Tissot PRX is from an authorized dealer, as this ensures authenticity, warranty, and the best selection of watches. It’s worth mentioning that Tissot is quite popular, so finding an AD should be quite easy, regardless of geographic location.

Final Thoughts

Imagine a $700 Swiss watch with an exclusive movement with 80 hours of power reserve, superb accuracy, a date complication, 100m of water resistance, and striking looks and quality. 

I do not think any manufacturer without the resources of the Swatch Group would be able to pull such a feat off, but here we are. The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is a modern marvel of horology, and it remains…the people’s watch.

rolex 216570 vs 226570

While there are many well-known pieces in the Rolex lineup, this watch is more of a ‘if you know, you know’ kind of piece. Today, we’re looking at the 216570 vs. 226570 Rolex Explorer II. These watches are similar but also have some key differences.

The watch comes in two dial colors: white and black. The Rolex Explorer II was first introduced in 1971 and was designed for explorers, cavers, and adventurers who needed a watch that could withstand extreme conditions. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

Its 24-hour bezel was a key feature that allowed wearers to differentiate between day and night, which was especially important for those spending long hours underground or in places with little natural light.

Over the years, the Explorer II has gained a reputation for being rugged, reliable, and easy to read in tough situations, making it a favorite for those who live an active lifestyle or need a tool watch they can count on. The 216570 and 226570 are both modern updates to this classic, continuing the legacy of the Explorer II with improved movements and design while staying true to the spirit of exploration.

The Rolex Explorer II 216570

Rolex Explorer II 216570

The Rolex Explorer II reference 216570 has a 42mm case diameter and a case thickness of 12.5mm, making it a solidly built watch that strikes a balance between being large enough to make a statement but not too big to be uncomfortable. It also has a lug-to-lug size of 50mm. 

The watch features the caliber 3187, which is widely regarded as one of the best movements Rolex produces. The caliber 3187 also comes with Paraflex shock absorbers, which help protect the movement from hard impacts and rough conditions, making it a great choice for anyone who’s planning to take their watch on outdoor adventures.

The movement offers a 48-hour power reserve, which is decent for most everyday situations, though slightly lower than the newer 226570 model; however, it’s still more than enough for most wearers, and the watch’s other features make it a solid choice for those seeking a reliable timepiece.

The Rolex Explorer II 226570

Rolex Explorer II 226570

The Rolex Explorer II reference 226570 has the same 42mm case diameter and 12.5mm case thickness as the previous model. While it’s very similar to the older version, there are small changes that add up to a big difference.

One noticeable upgrade for everyday wear is the anti-reflective coating applied to both the crystal and the Cyclops lens. The crown guards on this model are slightly more angular and thinner compared to the previous generation, which could be good or bad, depending on the extreme sports you do.

The lugs are a bit thinner as well, which makes the watch feel a little less bulky on the wrist. The biggest change, however, is the movement inside. The new movement is the caliber 3285, which offers a 70-hour power reserve.

This movement was introduced in 2018 and is also used in the Rolex GMT. When it comes to lume, both watches have Chromalight, but this model features an improved version that shines brighter and lasts longer.

Rolex Explorer II 216570 vs. 226570 – How to Choose

There’s no doubt that this watch is quite large compared to other models in the Rolex lineup. Is that a bad thing? No. I bring up the size because I often see people asking on social media: Is this too big? With a lug-to-lug measurement of 50mm on both models, this watch definitely feels bigger than most others.

Let’s break down the main differences one more time. I’ll start with the 226570, which has a new movement with a longer power reserve, thinner lugs, a larger bracelet, an anti-reflective coating on the crystal, and slimmer crown guards.

So, does all of this make a big difference? The short answer is no. These watches are very similar, which can make it harder to choose between them. The good news is that no matter which one you pick, both are solid options that look great on a steel bracelet, rubber strap, or even a NATO strap.

Now that we’ve covered all this, the bigger question is: What color dial should you choose? The white dial is the fan favorite. It looks amazing in person and is easy on the eyes. However, I think the black dial suits my lifestyle and everyday outfits better.

If you’re looking for something that makes a bigger statement, there are plenty of other options. But since you’re reading this, you probably want something tough and reliable for tackling those big deadlines. Do you already have other black dial watches in your collection? Maybe the white dial would be a good change for you.

I’ve had the chance to hold both of these models side by side, and honestly, I had a hard time telling which was which. Some parts of the 216570 are slightly smaller, but other parts are bigger than the 226570.

If you don’t handle watches every day, you might not notice much of a difference between the two at first glance. After trying both on back-to-back, I felt the 216570 wore smaller because of the 1mm difference in bracelet size. Since I wear an Explorer 1 214270 in 36mm as my daily, I think the 216570 is the winner for me, just because it feels a bit smaller on the wrist.

Conclusion

As I researched for this article, I kept coming across the question: Are there any real differences between the 216570 and 226570? The main differences come down to a newer movement and a slightly larger bracelet.

As I mentioned earlier, I prefer smaller watches, which is why I’d choose the 216570. However, for those who can wear a larger watch or want this watch as part of a collection and need a longer power reserve, the newer model is a good choice.

No matter which one you pick, just enjoy it, go out and explore, and make new memories while wearing your watch.

rolex jubilee vs oyster

Rolex is the grail watch brand for millions, and choosing the timepiece that best suits one’s taste involves many decisions. Dress watch or tool watch. Complications and functions. Dial and bezel colors. Naturally, price is a primary consideration. You get the idea. 

There is also the choice of strap or bracelet. This part of a watch can’t be overlooked. It may seem simple. After all, the function of the strap or bracelet is to hold your watch securely on your wrist. There is more to it than that, though. Comfort, ease of clasping and unclasping, durability, and aesthetics all play a role. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

If you have decided to go the bracelet route, you also want one that pairs well with the model you choose. There is a different aesthetic between dress and sport watches, and each is worn in different situations. Some watches are daily wearers and others are for special occasions only.  This is something else to consider when choosing the right bracelet for your watch and your taste.

The two most popular bracelet styles offered by Rolex are the Oyster and the Jubilee. Which one should you choose? Let’s take a closer look at these two fine options to help you make that decision. 

The Rolex Oyster Bracelet

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Bracelet

In Rolex’s earliest days, watches came on leather straps as standard. By the early 1930s, bracelets were offered as an option and sometimes added 50% to the cost of the timepiece. You had to be willing to pony up a hefty price for a watch on a bracelet.

The first Oyster bracelets were created by Gay Frères, the legendary designer that also made bracelets for other luxury brands such as Audemars Piguet and Zenith. The first iteration of the three-link bracelet that would become the Oyster appeared in the late ’30s.

The popular bracelet continued to evolve and was patented by Rolex in 1948. The Oyster went through iterations with side rivets, stretchable links, and several different clasps. It became a standard feature on many models and proved to be popular with the brand’s legion of fans.

A testament to its enduring appeal is that the modern Oyster is a robust and beautiful bracelet as well as one of the best-selling bracelets for Rolex even today. Chances are, if you spot a Rolex out in the wild, it will be attached to an Oyster bracelet.

The Oyster has a sporty and classy look. Its flat, broad links sit comfortably around the wrist. It is available in stainless steel and precious metals, depending on the model of the watch it is attached to. It looks especially good on the tool watches, such as the Submariner, Cosmograph Daytona, and GMT Master II.

Current Oyster bracelets are paired with end links that match the shape of the case they are attached to. The Oysterlock clasp is a secure closure, and the Oystersteel Rolex uses has a higher chromium content than other stainless steel.

This makes it more corrosion-resistant and well-suited to dive watches. Current Oyster bracelets also feature the Glidelock system. This allows quick adjustments on the bracelet of up to 2 mm, helping to create a perfect fit.

Some of Rolex’s bolder models, such as the Batman, Pepsi, and Sprite, have polished center links combined with brushed outer links on their Oyster bracelets.

This helps them pop and coordinates nicely with the bold dial and bezel color combinations. The generally sporty look of the Oyster makes it an excellent choice for an everyday watch.

In terms of robustness, the Oyster is solidly crafted, and its wide links enable it to stand up to the rigors of daily wear in all kinds of situations. This is a major factoring in its continuing popularity.

The brushed surfaces do a great job of hiding scratches and are the reason tool models like the Submariner come with an Oyster that has all the links brushed. The 20 mm lug width is the most common size and will suit most wrists. 

The Rolex Jubilee Bracelet

The Rolex Jubilee bracelet is the brand’s elegant and sophisticated option. As such, since 2018, it is not offered on stainless steel sport models. The Jubilee is designed to pair with the classiest dress watches, such as the Day-Date and Datejust.

The bracelet was created in 1945 to commemorate Rolex’s 40th anniversary, hence the name Jubilee. Originally made only in gold and offered only on the Datejust, the Jubilee is now available in stainless steel as well as other precious metals.

Two-tone Jubilees with gold center links and stainless steel end links look great with a two-tone case.  In addition to Rolex’s dress watches, the Jubilee is also an option on the GMT Master II watches.

The distinctive look of the jubilee comes from its five-link design. The two outer links are wider than the three inner links. This creates an “x” pattern in the center of the bracelet that elevates the style. With its smaller links, the Jubilee has greater flexibility, and most Rolex fans find it more comfortable than the Oyster. 

The small center links catch the light beautifully and add a nice flash of bling, further highlighting the elegant look of the watches with a Jubilee bracelet.

One downside is that, although it is a very well-made bracelet and is built to last, the links, especially on the softer gold ones, are more prone to scratches and blemishes of any kind are easily visible.

The Jubilee requires more care than the Oyster and, thus, is not recommended for an everyday timepiece. Save it for special occasions when you need to look your best.

Rolex recommends not wearing a Jubilee bracelet loosely. This causes more movement in the links and creates added wear. You will be shortening the life of the bracelet. If you bring a damaged Jubilee to an AD, they won’t repair it. Rolex will replace the entire bracelet, and this is costly. Store your Rolex on a Jubilee in its box and not in a jewelry box with other items. 

Rolex Oyster vs Jubilee – How to Choose

Now that you know quite a bit about each bracelet, let’s talk about how to choose the right one for you. First up is cost. Generally, if you buy your Rolex from an AD, a Jubilee will add about $200 to the price. Grey market price differences can be as much as $2,000. Your budget will have to be considered when making the decision.

If you are looking for a stainless steel sport watch like a diver or chronograph, you don’t have an option. You will get it with the Oyster bracelet.

This is what you want for a watch that may see some rugged wear. A GMT Master II is available with either bracelet. If that is the watch you seek, consider how often you will wear it and in what kinds of situations. If it’s going to be your travel companion, lean toward the Oyster. You will need the added robustness. 

Let’s move on to dress watches. The Jubilee certainly adds elegance, class, and bling. If this is going to be your “dress-to-impress” watch, worn to important business meetings, weddings, and other special events, the Jubilee is likely the one you want. It will spend a lot of time in the box where it is protected and be an incredible accessory for your best outfits.

If you are the type who rarely wears a suit or has occasion to dress up, go with the Oyster. It is a great-looking bracelet and looks good on even the dressier Rolexes. It will hold up better, especially if you wear your Rolex to work daily and on nights out.

Scratches are going to happen to everyday timepieces, and the Oyster does a much better job of hiding them. In terms of comfort, yes, the Jubilee feels better to most watch enthusiasts, but it’s not a huge difference, and the Oyster does sit nicely on the wrist. 

I’m not a Rolex guy, but if I were, given my love of dive watches and how often I wear them, I would go with the Oyster.  That’s just me. Your choice will depend on your needs and tastes. Now that you’ve got the lowdown on the Oyster and Jubilee, you are prepared to choose wisely. Go for it. 

Conclusion

The Rolex catalog is filled with reliable, accurate, and beautiful watches of every type. In addition to colors, movements, and complications, you have strap and bracelet choices.

The Oyster and Jubilee are the two most popular. Each is made to Rolex’s high standards and will compliment your timepiece nicely. Consider the details of each, try a few on, and then make an informed choice for a Rolex that you will love wearing.

Whether or not Frederique Constant is worth the money or not comes with quite a few considerations. Some are more objective than others, but at the end of the day, it’s crucial to truly understand the value behind any reputable timepiece.

A known part of the luxury watchmaking industry, Frederique Constant definitely leans toward the more elegant direction in their designs. What I like about the brand is they’re also known to be much more accessible compared to a lot of the competition.

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

Nevertheless, the details always matter, and that’s what will tell you whether the brand is worth the investment or not. This article highlights many focal points about the watchmaker to help you determine if they’re a good fit for your wrist.

Frederique Constant Watches in the Past

Frederique Constant Watches

The year 1988 is when the brand name became a reality, along with their ideas for a high-end watch that was affordable for everyday people. I’d say this is still a large part of what makes them popular in today’s market as well.

It’s pretty evident the brand has come a long way and is regarded for much more than just affordability. However, taking a look at their history, the watchmaker didn’t become a hit immediately. I was surprised to learn it took more than ten years for Frederique Constant to gain a notable scale of recognition.

Their reach expanded even further by 2004, as this was when they started to implement their in-house movements into their designs. Many watch lovers respect a move like this, and it’ll always garner attention on a global scale.

Aside from the fact it’s not a simple feat, it’s a sentiment towards the brand’s outlook on what they’re creating. I find myself more inclined to care when the brand does as well, and Frederique Constant is a great example of that.

There’s plenty to praise about the watchmaker, but history matters for the ups and the downs. Some of this comes down to perception, as the brand’s growth came with its fair share of twists and turns.

When 2002 rolled around, that was the first time the watchmaker started to dabble with sportier design choices. Even though it caters to a more niche market, it’s a massive one nonetheless. I myself appreciate a sporty timepiece that suits particular occasions. 

As I spent time learning about the company, it became apparent that its success is due to repeated innovation. Not only in design and production elements but also in catalog diversity and blending into different submarkets.

Fast forward to 2016, and the brand’s popularity and overall success led to it being acquired by Citizen. You might think this is the end of what makes a company like this great, but thankfully, that isn’t what happened here. Even today, I feel that Frederique Constant holds a stronger market presence and reputation than ever before.

Frederique Constant Watches Today

Frederique Constant Watches Today

Once you take a look past 2020, it’s no secret that the watchmaker has become a modern-day contender among the best of the best. I have to admire that they started out being looked at as purely an entry-level watchmaker and are now seen as a reputable luxury option. The best part is they still maintain a more affordable stance, but the outlook on the brand comes with a much higher bar than it used to.

To be honest, I didn’t find my way to this brand until a few years ago, which means I’m late to the game. In today’s world, Frederique Constant is respected among collectors and enthusiasts alike.

It only took one wear for me to dive off into a rabbit hole about the company’s history. Although I only have one in my own collection, I keep a prying eye for anything new from the brand moving forward.

Another angle they can be proud of is that they’ve really honed in on their in-house movement production. When this used to be an exciting new feat, it is now a core focal point in the whole of their production process. With years of innovation and production under their belt, the brand now boasts over 30 proprietary calibers. Some of my favorite examples of diversity in their catalog include the styles behind their Highlife, Classics, and Manufacture collections.

From what I can tell, some of their most popular models include the Slimline Moonphase Manufacture and Highlife Automatic COSC, to name a few. You can even find a few options with smartwatch technology for those who appreciate feature-rich varieties.

Having the industry support and direction from Citizen will only cement this brand even further down the line. The Frederique Constant name has only been around the watch industry for a few decades, so you can assume it has a long way to go. I find myself looking into what’s new from the brand, even if there isn’t any circulating news.

While they may not be my first choice, they’ve still become a part of my general rotation. I like to keep things fresh, and I rotate through several timepieces on a weekly basis.

What Frederique Constant brings to my look is unique and isn’t found in anything else from my collection. They may not be the first name that comes to mind in the context of luxury watchmaking, but I’m sure it’s only a matter of time.

As more people become aware of what they bring to the market, they’ll start to keep more of a watchful eye. The idea of what separates them from the competition can be debated, but I stand firm on several points.

From the look and design of their watches to the ode to craftsmanship that’s clear from every angle, there’s a lot to appreciate about Frederique Constant.

What Makes Frederique Constant Watches Stand Out?

It might seem more commonplace nowadays, but a big part of what helps the watchmaker stand out is their in-house movement. Sure, other high-end brands do this too, but not to the extent you might think. There are also many false claims from manufacturers throughout the world that they do everything in-house.

This isn’t always the case, but with Frederique Constant, you have no need to worry. Another aspect that draws me in as a watchlover is their transparency with themselves. It isn’t hard to learn about the brand, their products, and the ins and outs of their process.

Not only does this make people feel more comfortable buying, but it’s an extra layer to what helps them stand out in a flooded market. Aside from this point, other angles to focus on include their innovation toward technology in watchmaking and the balance between premiums and affordability.

In short, you can find many different types of watches that exude a luxurious look and feel for a surprisingly low cost. Keep in mind this is in comparison to what’s already out there. However, it’s true that the Frederique catalog is suitable for a broad range of budgets.

I know that many people are put off by watchmakers who tend to only cater to a certain tax bracket. Some of this can be understandable, depending on the brand and the watch, but most people just want accessibility. With Frederique Constant, you get that luxurious taste without having to go into a sizable amount of debt for it. Think of the $1,000 to $5,000 range instead of $10,000 or more.

Although I’m really sold on smartwatches or tech-infused designs very much, I have to say their approach to hybrid timepieces impresses me. You can really feel the mechanical nature of the watch is still there, but with a few enhancements to go along with it.

I think what also keeps me interested is the fact that the company is still so young. Think about what they’ll be able to accomplish with just a few more decades of experience on the market. Right now, I look at them as a fitting choice for the everyday individual who wants some quality to sport. 

Some of you may disagree, but I feel their watches are best suited for professional environments, even the sportier designs. This isn’t to say their watches aren’t diverse in use case, but that’s where I feel they’ll look their best.

Should you get a Frederique Constant Watch?

A lot of this comes down to personal preference, but you also want to consider what’s objective about the watchmaker. What’s true here is that Frederique Constant is a great option for first-time buyers. If you’re looking to start collecting watches or simply want something a little on the higher end, you can’t go wrong with this choice.

The price point is nearly impossible to beat, considering the quality you’re getting. For me, it’s their stance on in-house movements on top of the low price point that makes them such a shocker. Sure, you might end up forking over a couple of thousand for one watch, but it’s one you’ll be proud of for a lifetime.

Certain popular styles won’t be found here, though, like dive watches, for example. I’d say this shouldn’t be a deal breaker for you, as you’d be missing out otherwise. This is one of those examples of strong value for money. More importantly, a level of quality that won’t give out on you in a few year’s time.

I only have one of my own, but it has quickly made me a lifelong fan of what they’re capable of. If you like that professional yet dazzling look of high-end timepieces but usually can’t face the cost, Frederique Constant should be your next thought. More importantly, they’re now a first thought for me. I truly appreciate their stance on affordability without cutting every corner they can on quality.

Take a glance at their catalog when you get the chance, and you’ll see what I mean about the professional tone. You’ll get a variety of classic styles to choose from, and they all come with their unique brand flair and modern stylistic choices.

They’re a great example of why you shouldn’t judge a book on its cover alone. Many people overlook certain watches from merely taking a look at the price point. In reality, overlooking Frederique would be a huge miss for anyone who appreciates real craftsmanship.

The bottom line

Frederique Constant definitely has quite a bit of competition to face, but it’s clear they aren’t scared of the future. They cemented themselves in the industry even further after Citizen stepped into the picture.

I’m a fan, and what really keeps me looking for more is the fact that I appreciate what they have to offer beyond the timepiece alone. It’s a company that makes me excited to see what comes next. Always get your start with a reputable retailer like Exquisite Timepieces so you know you’re working authenticity before anything else.

rolex 5512 vs 5513

What is the world’s most famous dive watch? I don’t have the answer, but I’m certain the Rolex Submariner is somewhere near the top of the list. It’s a model that’s far from just some reliable dive watch – although it’s certainly that too – but a cultural icon and one of the most highly collectible timepieces of all time.   

The Rolex Submariner is not new, having launched back in 1953, so as you’d expect, there’s a plethora of old and new models out there. But if you were to ask me, two of the most iconic models in the Submariner’s lineup are the references 5512 and 5513. 

bot-only-imagebot-only-image

These vintage classics represent the golden age of Rolex’s dive watches, and while they may look nearly identical at first glance, there’s a lot hiding beneath the surface that sets them apart. 

Both models feature the signature 40mm stainless steel case, crown guards, rotating bezel, and time-only black dials that define the early Submariner aesthetic. They also share the robust acrylic crystals that marked the pre-sapphire era, making them quintessential vintage pieces. 

But the 5512 and 5513 are different in more ways than you might expect. So, if you’re wondering what the differences are between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 and you’re deciding which vintage model to get for yourself, we suggest you keep reading… 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 

Rolex Submariner 5512 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 is an important model in the history of the Swiss watchmaker, as it marked a rather major turning point in both the design and functionality of the Submariner collection. Introduced in 1959, the 5512 was the first Submariner to feature crown guards, a bold innovation that set the stage for the modern dive watch as we know it. 

Before the 5512, Submariners lacked protective shoulders around the winding crown, leaving it vulnerable to damage from accidental knocks. By adding crown guards, Rolex not only made the Submariner more durable but also expanded the case size from 38mm to 40mm, giving the watch its iconic proportions.

What makes the 5512 even more fascinating is the evolution of its crown guard design. Early models were fitted with square crown guards, a style Rolex quickly abandoned due to its impracticality and aesthetics. 

Next came the pointed crown guards, which were produced until 1963, when the more familiar rounded crown guards were introduced. These variations, particularly the rare square and pointed crown guards, are highly prized by collectors today. 

The Submariner 5512 was also notable for its technical advancements. Early examples were powered by the Caliber 1530 movement, which was not chronometer-certified. These models also featured dials with only two lines of text indicating the water resistance and the Submariner name. 

However, this changed when Rolex transitioned to the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570, both chronometer-certified movements. With this upgrade, the dials gained two additional lines of text to indicate the watch’s chronometer status, creating the now-famous “four-line” dial. 

Aesthetically, the 5512 is a quintessential vintage Submariner. Its stainless steel case is robust and functional, while the rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert provides a practical 60-minute scale for divers. 

Early models featured gilt-gloss dials, which were later replaced by matte dials, marking the shift from a more decorative to a more utilitarian look. The luminous markers on the dials were initially made with radium, but Rolex eventually transitioned to tritium for safety reasons. 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 was in production for an impressive two decades, officially ceasing in 1978. Over its lifespan, it remained a watch designed with professional divers in mind but gained popularity far beyond the diving community. Today, its enduring appeal lies in its perfect balance of vintage charm, technical innovation, and historical significance.

The Rolex Submariner 5513 

Rolex Submariner 5513

The Rolex Submariner 5513 was launched a couple of years later, in 1962, as the sibling to the 5512. While the two models appear nearly identical at a glance, the 5513 carved out its own legacy as the non-chronometer-certified version of Rolex’s iconic dive watch. 

This distinction was reflected in its use of the Caliber 1530 and later the Caliber 1520, both of which were simpler, non-chronometer movements. By comparison, the 5512, with its chronometer-certified calibers, bore additional text on its dial proclaiming its superior precision. 

The dial of the 5513 is one of its defining features. Early examples sported the minimalist two-line configuration, emphasizing the Submariner name and depth rating, giving it a clean and understated appearance. 

These early models also featured gilt-gloss dials, a hallmark of the era, and were fitted with pointed crown guards, a design shared with the 5512 of the same period. As production continued, Rolex transitioned to matte black dials with painted hour markers and, later still, glossy black dials with white gold surrounds on the markers. 

In terms of the case and bezel, the 5513 retained the 40mm stainless steel construction that has become synonymous with the Submariner. Its rotating bezel, featuring a black aluminum insert with a 0-60-minute scale, also remained, as did the watch’s acrylic crystal glass and the luminous material on its dial and hands, which shifted from radium in the earliest examples to the safer tritium in later models. 

The 5513’s longevity is another remarkable aspect of its history. While the 5512 ceased production in the late 1970s, the 5513 continued to be manufactured until 1989, making it one of the longest-running Submariner references. 

This extended production period means that collectors can often find a wide range of variations, from early gilt dials with rare features to later models with more contemporary design elements. 

The Rolex Submariner 5513 is also well known for its cultural significance. It was famously worn by Sean Connery’s James Bond in Dr. No and Goldfinger, cementing its status as an icon not just of horology but also of popular culture. This association with 007 has only added to its allure among vintage watch enthusiasts.

Rolex Submariner 5512 vs 5513 – How to Choose 

When deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513, you’re faced with two iconic models that look incredibly similar at first glance. 

However, as we’ve touched on already, there are some key differences under the surface that can guide your choice. So what exactly sets these two vintage Submariners apart, and which one will suit your needs best? 

Movement: Chronometer vs. Non-Chronometer

The most significant difference between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 lies in their movements. The Submariner 5512 was fitted with chronometer-certified movements, starting with the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570. 

These movements met Rolex’s exacting standards for precision, which is why the 5512 dials bear the “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text, also known as the “four-line dial.”

In contrast, the 5513 was designed as a simpler, non-chronometer version. It began with the Caliber 1530 and transitioned to the Caliber 1520. Its dials feature only two lines of text, giving it a cleaner and more understated appearance. 

While the differences in performance may not be noticeable to a casual wearer, collectors often place a premium on the chronometer status of the 5512.

Rarity and Availability

The production periods of these models also contribute to their differences in rarity. The 5512 was introduced in 1959 and discontinued in 1978, giving it a relatively shorter production run. This means fewer 5512 examples exist in the market today, making it a rarer and more exclusive choice.

The 5513, on the other hand, enjoyed a much longer production run from 1962 to 1989. As a result, it’s often easier to find a 5513 in various conditions and configurations, offering more options for collectors and enthusiasts alike.

Aesthetics and Design

Both the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 share the classic 40mm stainless steel case, rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert, and vintage acrylic crystal. Early examples of both models feature gilt-gloss dials and pointed crown guards, while later iterations transitioned to matte dials with painted markers and, eventually, glossy dials with white gold surrounds.

The main visual difference lies in the dial text: the 5512’s four-line dial versus the 5513’s simpler two-line configuration. This distinction makes the 5512 feel slightly more technical and prestigious, while the 5513 offers a cleaner, minimalist aesthetic that other collectors will prefer.

Price Considerations

The chronometer-certified 5512 has historically been more expensive than the 5513 owing to its higher level of technical achievement and shorter production run. However, the price gap can also depend on the specific model variation, condition, and rarity. 

Early examples with gilt dials or unique features like square crown guards can command significant premiums, regardless of the reference.

For the budget-conscious collector, the 5513 may present a more accessible entry point into the world of vintage Submariners. Its longer production run means there’s a greater variety of options, from early gilt-dial models to later glossy-dial versions.

Which One Should You Pick?

Deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 ultimately comes down to your personal priorities as a collector or enthusiast. 

Each model offers unique qualities that cater to different tastes and preferences, making this choice a matter of what you value most in a vintage watch.

If exclusivity and technical prowess top your list, the Rolex Submariner 5512 is going to be the better fit for you. With its chronometer-certified movement and the coveted “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text on its dial, the 5512 stands as a testament to Rolex’s precision and attention to detail. 

Its shorter production run also adds an element of rarity, making it a sought-after piece for collectors who prioritize historical significance and exclusivity.

On the other hand, the Rolex Submariner 5513 is ideal for those drawn to simplicity and timeless design. Its two-line dial offers a clean, minimalist aesthetic that has a charm all of its own. 

It also had a longer production run spanning nearly three decades, so it provides plenty more options to collectors, so you have more chance of choosing from early gilt-dial examples to later glossy-dial variations.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 is a decision that reflects your unique priorities as a collector or enthusiast. Each model holds its own special place in the history of Rolex, offering distinct characteristics that make them both highly desirable. 

The 5512 stands out with its chronometer-certified movement and rarity, while the 5513 captures attention with its clean, timeless design and wide-ranging options.

Owning either reference is a privilege, as both showcase the unparalleled craftsmanship and enduring appeal that has defined Rolex for generations. 

For many, myself included, these two references mark the end of the classic vintage Submariner era. Being able to glance at your wrist and be reminded of this—especially when so many others are choosing modern-day Rolex Submariners—is truly a special experience.

With the insights shared here, you’re now equipped to choose the Rolex Submariner that aligns best with your personal tastes and values. The 5512 and 5513 each bring something unique to the table, and either one would make a remarkable addition to any collection

To Top